Please join us at the seventh Womxn in Design and Architecture Conference at Princeton School of Architecture, Svetlana Kana Radević: Aggregate Assemblies, on March 2 & 3, 2023.
To register in person, or view the live stream, visit wda.princeton.edu.
Svetlana Kana Radević’s architecture is a radical act of mediation. Rising to prominence in post-war Yugoslavia, her buildings speak on all scales, engaging geo-political and social complexities. Drawing from knowledge of materiality and vernacular traditions within her native Montenegro (formerly Yugoslavia), her work filters modernism’s globalized forces through an intimate, place-based lens. Radević’s civic spaces re-centered provincial knowledge and facilitated a socially-progressive public sphere within the Yugoslav socialist state.
At age 29, Radević became the youngest and only woman to receive the national Yugoslavian Borba Award for Architecture in 1968 for her design of Hotel Podgorica. Prominent projects such as the Podgorica Bus Terminal, Petrovac Apartment Building, and Monument to Fallen Fighters express Radević's commitment to generating a symbiosis between civic engagement and landscape design through the use of local building materials, bold forms, and generous proportions. Radević articulated her own cross-cultural practice, working simultaneously between the United States, Japan, France, Russia, and Yugoslavia, where she eventually returned for the remainder of her career.
The seventh Womxn in Design and Architecture Conference at the Princeton School of Architecture honors the life and work of Svetlana Kana Radević. The 2022-23 conference proceedings will call on the discipline with timely topics and inquiries, such as What is architecture’s role in times of social and political transformation? How can architecture re-center local systems of power, collective memory, and vernacular tradition? Disrupting the dichotomy between periphery and center while standing as one of the most avant-garde voices of Yugoslavian architecture, Radević’s legacy raises questions that are as pressing now as they were during her lifetime.
PROGRAM SCHEDULE
THURSDAY, MARCH 2
6pm
WELCOME + INTRODUCTION
Dean Mónica Ponce de León
WDA INTRODUCTION + LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
KEYNOTE PRESENTATION
Anna Kats—Ph.D. student, History of Architecture, Institute of Fine Arts
Q&A
Moderated by Patty Hazle and Hermine Demaël—WDA Members
RECEPTION
FRIDAY, MARCH 3
10am
WELCOME
Dean Mónica Ponce de León
WDA INTRODUCTION + LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
10:15am
SOCIOPOLITICAL FRAMEWORKS
INTRODUCTION + MODERATION
Julia Chou, Vanessa Gonzalez, and Ewa Roztocka—WDA Members
PANELISTS
Ena Kukić—Lecturer, Institute of Construction and Design Principles and Ph.D. candidate, Institute of Design and Building Typology, Graz University of Technology, Austria
Sonja Dragović—Ph.D. candidate, Iscte - University Institute of Lisbon; Researcher, DINÂMIA'CET-Iscte - Centre for Socioeconomic and Territorial Studies; KANA/ko ako ne arhitekt
Chiara Bonfiglioli—Lecturer, Gender & Women’s Studies at University College Cork, Ireland
Paula Petričević—Philosophy teacher, Gymnasium Kotor, Montenegro
DISCUSSION + Q&A
11:30am
STRUCTURE & STYLE
INTRODUCTION + MODERATION
Laura Fegely, Sofia Dominguez Rojo, Shoshana Torn—WDA Members
PANELISTS
Ljiljana Blagojević, Ph.D.—Architect; Design Manager, Deka Inženjering, Belgrade
Alla Vronskaya—Professor of the History and Theory of Architecture, University of Kassel, Germany
Prof. a.D. Dr.-Ing. Mary Pepchinski—Technische Universität Dresden / Hochschule für Technik und Wirtschaft Dresden
Ana Miljački, Ph.D.—Critic; Curator; Professor of Architecture, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
DISCUSSION + Q&A
12:45pm
LUNCH
1:30pm
SITE & SITUATION
INTRODUCTION + MODERATION
Jocelyn Beausire, Sophia-Rose Diodati, and Janeen Zheng—WDA Members
PANELISTS
Dr. Ljubica Spaskovska—Author; Lecturer in European History, University of Exeter
Dr. Lina Džuverović—Lecturer, Arts Policy and Management at the Department for Film, Media and Cultural Studies, Birkbeck, University of London
Łukasz Stanek—Professor of Architecture, Taubman College of Architecture and Urban Planning, University of Michigan
Dr. Dubravka Sekulić—Senior Tutor, School of Architecture, Royal College of Art, London, UK
Vladimir Kulić—Professor and David Lingle Faculty Fellow, Department of Architecture, College of Design, Iowa State University
3pm
DIALOGUES ON DECOMMODIFIED SPACE & Q&A
3:45pm
CLOSING REMARKS
Courtney Coffman—Manager of Lectures and Publications, Princeton SoA
4pm
RECEPTION
PANEL DESCRIPTIONS
Sociopolitical Frameworks
As both a committed civil servant and autonomous practicing architect, Svetlana Kana Radević designed spaces that supported dialogue between the Yugoslav socialist state and its public. Growing up in post-WWII Montenegro, Radević bore witness firsthand to the destruction and reconstruction of the country’s capital, Podgorica. Following her graduation from the University of Belgrade in 1963, Radević led a prolific architectural practice that challenged provincial and patriarchal ideals and proposed new ways of living.
How did movements around class struggle and worker self-management intersect with shifting Montenegrin gender politics within the broader context of socialist Yugoslavia? What role did women architects play in restructuring domestic environments within postwar urban planning and architecture?
Structure & Style
As the principal designer and sole proprietor of her own architectural practice, Svetlana Kana Radević formulated her own architectural language. Drawing from the globalizing lexicon of late Modernism and the vernacular traditions of her homeland, she engaged an expansive network of influences and resisted a singularly-defined style. Radević’s presence and practice disrupted traditional conceptions of gender within the Yugoslavian socialist state while negotiating between public and private practice and urban planning and architectural modes of engagement. Her architecture utilized concrete slabs with expressive curves, and sculptural forms articulated through techniques and materials drawn from the local environment. Ambitious in scale and form, Radević’s buildings address complex programmatic requirements with generous public spaces and careful attention to place.
How did Radević’s morphological, material, and structural choices relate to her stylistic frames of reference? To what extent did they speak to the lived experiences of the public within the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia?
Site & Situation
Svetlana Kana Radević’s practice mediated a range of geographies and architectural discourses. Already an accomplished architect, Radević studied as a Fulbright Fellow at the University of Pennsylvania, achieving her Master's degree in Louis Kahn’s Master Class in 1972, and later pursuing her doctorate. She continued on to Tokyo, Japan, working at Kishō Kurokawa’s atelier and embedding herself within the Japanese Metabolist Movement. Working between Yugoslavia, Japan, the United States—and even France and Russia—Radević articulated her own axis of architectural influence. Later centering her practice in Montenegro, she maintained cross-geographic connections while differentiating herself from the market-driven West and the communist sphere of the 1960s and 70s Yugoslavia.
To what extent do Radević’s life and career lead us to question the relationships between center and periphery within the architectural canon? What repercussions might the inclusion of her woman-led, cross-geographic practice have within the field today?
Decommodified Space
Svetlana Kana Radević envisioned her architecture as a tool, serving the public good and continuing the efforts of the socialist welfare state. Dedicated to workers’ rights to a high material quality of life, her architecture was driven by an ideological framework in which public spaces hold radical potential for social and political change. From the Hotel Podgorica to an apartment block for a workers’ cooperative in Petrovac-na-Moru, Radević’s work stands as testament to the strength of her political commitment, and her ability to translate her beliefs into accessible, egalitarian, and decommodified buildings of all types. Often operating as social condensers, Radević’s structures not only sheltered their inhabitants but framed new ideas of collective living and social cohesion.
How does Radević’s methodology serve as a precedent for moving outside of economizing logic and into pro-social ideals of self-management and collective ownership? To what extent does her approach model alternatives to modern-day architectural practice and ideology?
Organized by Womxn in Design and Architecture (WDA), a graduate student group formed in 2014 at Princeton University School of Architecture, this annual conference celebrates the work and legacy of a pivotal architect or designer with contributions from international historians and scholars, in addition to artists, curators, and practitioners. Read more about the conference series here.
WDA conferences are made possible by the Jean Labatut Memorial Lectures in Architecture and Urban Planning Fund at Princeton University.
WDA is open to all graduate students regardless of identity.
